V Secretary Of State For Justice Essay - 1434 Words

In this essay, I am going to analyse R(Bourgass) v Secretary of State for Justice, an administrative case based on the exercise of ministerial powers by public bodies. The two issues raised in this case were (i) whether the decisions to segregate the prisoners for substantial periods were lawfully authorised and (ii) whether the procedure on segregation was considered fair under the common law. The decision for segregation were made under the Prison Act 1952, Rule 45 of the Prison Rules 1999 and PSO 1700. Rule 45(1) allows the prison governor to arrange the prisoner to be removed from association; rule 45(2) provides that the prisoner shall not be segregated under the rule for more than 72 hours â€Å"without the authority of the Secretary of State† and that authority â€Å"shall be for a period not exceeding 14 days.† This case also involves human rights, procedural fairness, ultra vires principle and the judicial review process in the United Kingdom. Facts and Decisions In this case, Bourgass has been held in segregation for more than 72 hours ordered by a prison officer and longer than 14 days that the Secretary of State may authorise. His representative initiated judicial review proceedings. They were dismissed by the High Court. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals, whereas the Supreme Court allowed the appeals. Reasons for the decision: On this first issue, it was clear from Rule 45(2) that the segregation for a period exceeding 72 hours was not authorised by theShow MoreRelatedThe Three Branches Of Government Essay1146 Words   |  5 Pages The Three Branches of Government In 1787 the leaders of the united states gathered to write the constitution which they also divided into three branches to ensure a central government in which no group or individual gains too much control. The three branches consists on the following Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Legislative branch rejects or confirms presidential appointments, and also has the authority to declareRead MoreMajor Supreme Court Cases Under Judge John Marshall1482 Words   |  6 Pagesdecisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on todays Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gi bbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined nationalRead More Major Supreme Court Cases Under Judge John Marshall Essay1441 Words   |  6 Pagesdecisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today’s Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined nationalRead MoreThe Federal Reserve - Their Collection Agency the Irs - and the Big Lie!1068 Words   |  5 Pagesmetal Products v. IRS etal. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I.) You can click on the citation for a complete text of the discovery document and I refer you to discovery question No. 4 on page 2 where the attorney general specifically deni es that the IRS is an agency of the Government. Holy cow! The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury. The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviatedRead MoreJudicial Review1615 Words   |  7 Pagesbeen abused. Judicial review is an application to the Courts to assess an action or decision made by a public body on a point of public law. A particular decision may be found to be in breach of natural justice or have been made ultra vires, that is, beyond the scope of the powers. The case of O’Reilly v Mackman shows the general rule that when claiming against a public body, judicial review should be used. Lord Diplock described this as an ‘exclusivity principle’. The use of this principle has beenRead MoreThe Rule Of Law : A Fundamental Principle1409 Words   |  6 Pagesextent to which the Rule of law requires access to justice one must define what exactly access to justice means. Professor Moorhead describes access to justice as not being limited to lawyers and courts, It means access to ombudsmen, advice agencies and the police law. It means public authorities behaving properly. It means everyone having some basic understanding of their rights. It means making law less complex and more intelligible . Access to justice would be, being treated fairly according to theRead MoreMarbury V. Madison991 Words   |  4 PagesMarbury v. Madison On February 24, 1803 Chief Justice John Marshall and the rest of the Supreme Court decided on the seemingly insignificant case of Marbury v. Madison. While ruling the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional, Judicial Review was established. Granting the Supreme Court the power to rule acts of the Legislative and/or Executive Branch of government unconstitutional, hence serving as a landmark case that further legitimatized the Judicial Branch as a separate, but balanced branchRead MoreEssay on The Case of Marbury v. Madison973 Words   |  4 Pages The case of Marbury v. Madison centers on a case brought before the Supreme Court by William Marbury. Shortly after Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in the election of 1800, Congress increased the number of circuit courts. Adams sought to fill these new vacancies with people who had Federalist backgrounds. To accomplish this, he used the powers granted under the Organic Act to issue appointments to 42 justices of the peace and 16 ci rcuit court justices for the District of Columbia. AdamsRead MoreJudicial Review Essay1099 Words   |  5 Pagesestablished in the United States Constitution. The Judicial Branch is a dual court system consisting of States Courts, and the Federal Courts, each have their specific jurisdiction. The States Courts hear all cases within the State. The Federal Courts only hear cases involving a Federal issue, an appeal from a lower courts decision and cases involving diversity of citizenship. Diversity of citizenship cases involve people from different states, cases that involve a United States Citizen and a foreignRead MoreCase Brief Summary: Marbury V. Madison1088 Words   |  5 PagesCase Brief Summary: Marbury v. Madison Robert L. Broadwater PAD 525 Strayer University Dr. O’Neal July 09, 2012 Summary of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803). Facts The incumbent president Federalist John Adams was defeat in the presidential election by Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson. The day before leaving office, President John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia. This was